America’ single political party (Democrats&Republicans) is back in the interventionist business. On his first few days in office, Biden reportedly sent additional U.S. military forces into Syria. Why? To counter the Russians of course. Obviously, brain-dead U.S. military interventionism never changes. Perhaps the bipartisan governing elite’s traditional zest for seeing body bags, severed limbs, and mentally wounded men and women coming home from overseas was so rudely denied them during the no-war Trump era, that they now need a new and steady flow of dead and maimed service personnel.
The elitists/globalists put their worthless hides at serious risk, however. After Trump’s splendid no-war performance, the U.S. military’s enlisted personnel and field grade officers surely realize that there is nothing in the Arab world worth a drop of their blood, let alone a leg or their life. Odds are that a Biden interventionist misadventure – like those of Clinton, Bush, and Obama, not meant to be won – may have the wonderful impact of convincing our ground forces that Trump is the only president since Reagan who gives a good damn about them, and that the District of Columbia is packed to the gunnels with purported people who want to spend their lives like monopoly money.
On Syria, it can only be repeated that there is not a single thing in that country that can be defined as a genuine U.S. national-security interest. The Russians are there? So what? Let them stay, their forces will consume money and materials that Putin would prefer not to expend. If the Russian military begins to lose troops in the numbers they did in Afghanistan (1979-1989), the Russian people will oppose a repeat of that fiasco. Only one country can make up a plausible fear of Russia’s presence in Syria, and that is Israel, and if Israel thinks Russia-in-Syria is a threat to its survival, let the Israeli military – with no U.S. assistance whatsoever – try to evict the Russians. Those hating Trump, after all, must pay a price for indulging in that form of dementia, and no one merits paying a steep and bloody price more that Netanyahu’s government and Jewish-Americans. In a Russia-vs-Israel fight, the American republic’s security does not have a dog in the fight, but, by God, it would be fun to sit back and watch two of the republic’s external enemies batter themselves to pulp.
Now, on to Burma or Myanmar, the choice of moniker is yours. Again, there is one question that ought to be foremost in every American’s mind when (if?) they dwell on this issue; namely, why should anyone in the United States give a good god-damn about who rules in Rangoon (AKA: Yangon)? The answer is – as in Syria – there is no reason for any American to give a damn.
U.S. and Western diplomats are screaming in horror that the Burmese military overthrew the country’s elected leader Aung San Suu Kyi and disrupted the “democratic process” she was leading. The action, the Myanamar military says, was based on her part in electoral manipulation, reportedly including the use of Dominion voting machines. (NB: Well, it clearly happened and succeeded in the United States, why not in Myanmar?) The Biden administration, of course, is yelling foul and weeping crocodile tears about Suu Kyi’s ouster. This is as it should be, as her installation as the major leader in Burma was the sole, so-called “diplomat accomplishment” over the two terms of the Obama-Biden-Clinton administration. Hillary, in particular, was just pleased as punch to be joined by a fellow incompetent-to-the-point-of-uselessness girl leader loose in the world.
The U.S. and UK campaign – beware the malign intent of Burma’s former imperial master — to put Suu Kyi in power contained only what amounted to worthless marquee claims to be a battle for freedom and democracy. The U.S. and UK governments – with the UN, the EU, George Soros, his Open Society group, and that organization’s myriad criminal affiliates – were there to secure expanded access to two of the Globalists key supply lines, one for narcotics, and the other for trafficking women and children for illicit purposes. Both have long been Globalist priorities and Burma is a place where operations supporting both goals can be conducted in a far away and difficult-to-access locale. Because the international mainstream media seldom reports on child-trafficking, it is hard to gauge the level of that particular activity. But on the narcotics front, Suu Kyi presided over the expansion of Burma’s once heroin-centric drug industry, allowing the creation of multiple new drug-trafficking opportunities, especially in the death-dealing drug fentanyl and its analogues. In May, 2020, for example, an Asian media outlet reported that
“raids, carried out between February 20 and April 9 in Kutkhai Township in Shan State, eastern Myanmar, started with a small seizure of methamphetamine tablets, and led to the discovery of 3,748.5 liters of methyl fentanyl, 193.5 million methamphetamine pills, over 500 kilograms of crystal methamphetamine, 292 kilograms of heroin, and other significant quantities of opium, morphine, ephedrine, and precursor chemicals.” (1)
Ah, yes, an Amazon-like emporium of drug products brought to you, as always, courtesy of Western elites, Soros, and the UN – and of course their apparatchik, Aung San Suu Kyi. This rancid gang of people and organizations defrauded the Burmese people. They imposed on them not a leader, but a Globalist puppet, not unlike Biden.
And one more thing. Suu Kyi, that great champion of freedom, democracy, and human rights, could not find a moment that was appropriate to condemn, let alone try to stop, the Buddhist-clergy-backed Burmese military’s savage war against the country’s Muslim Rohingya population. To be fair, though, she surely intends to include a touching poem in her next book to commemorate and soothe the bodies of the dead Rohingya women and children that are still bobbing about in the Bay of Bengal.
Overall, U.S. military intervention abroad is always a curse on the American people, and most often it is a tool of the globalist elite to increase their wealth, expand their power, and impoverish their own people. Indeed, the only place where a wide-ranging and lethal-if-necessary U.S. military intervention is desperately needed today is in the District of Columbia. After all, the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution both declare that it is the job of the military and the citizenry alike to eradicate “all enemies foreign and domestic”. The enemy in DC is both.
Endnote:
–1.) https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3936902, 19 May 2020
