A bullet from the back of a bush took Medgar Evers’ blood
A finger fired the trigger to his name
A handle hid out in the dark
A hand set the spark
Two eyes took the aim
Behind a man’s brain
But he can’t be blamed
He’s only a pawn in their game
–Bob Dylan, Only a Pawn in Their Game, 1963
Only in the English-speaking could this keep happening. An Australian shooter — perhaps a new version of the brilliant Mr. Dylan’s pawn — goes to New Zealand, murders fifty Muslim citizens, and the world again is subjected to two inevitable events. First, the anti-gun activists who know and care nothing about the dead Muslims in Christchurch have started the inevitable grief festival – candles, flowers, notes, and other crap – as well as chanting the Islam-is-the-religion-of-peace mantra. Second, an obviously unfit, nerdy, and anti-gun New Zealand Prime Minister — Jacinda Ardern – launches an attack on her own people because her intelligence and police services failed to track the attacker, and then took forever to get to the scene of the murders. Like Barack Obama’s consistent behavior in similar situations, Ardern’s first instinct was anti-gun, and she swore to disarm New Zealanders in short order.
Now, let’s get this straight. The Australian attacker, given his behavior during the attack, clearly is a trained and skilled mercenary. This judgment is backed by what the press has reported about his globetrotting itinerary, which shows that he focused his travel on countries where fighting and drug trafficking are commonplace. Are we really to believe that New Zealand’s intelligence and security services were stupid or lazy enough not to have watch-listed this man, asked the Australians to keep close tabs on him in that country, or shared the data about him with MI-6 and CIA, both of which are better positioned than New Zealand’s services to keep track of him as he traveled, as well as to provide early warning of his ill-intent.
If you do not accept that such an utterly complete failure occurred, you would almost think that “Five-Eyes” cooperation in regard to this attack was meant to assure that the Australian shooter succeeded. After all, parts of the British, Australian, and U.S. external intelligence services cooperatively worked with Obama, the Democratic Party, and the international media to overthrow the legitimately elected Trump administration. In this light, it is not at all odd that the attacker’s so-called manifesto amounts to one stone that hit two of the Democrats’ favorite birds, their goal of undermining and eventually eliminating Trump, and their desperate eagerness to end the ability of private citizens to possess the guns needed to prevent the authoritarian, one-party state they want to install in the United States.
There also are the facts that former-DNI James Clapper was in Australia for visit in November, 2018, and former-DNC chief John Podesta was in New Zealand for several days in March, 2019. Both men fully support the elimination of President Trump and the U.S. Democratic Party’s policy of creating and managing armed terrorist wings like ANTIFA, BLM, and BAM to riot, burn cars, destroy other property, and intimidate and attack people – usually Trump supporters — in the United States. Only idiots would accept the two visits as simple coincidences and reject out of hand a hunch that either or both men had something to do with the Christchurch attack. Both men should be seen as “persons of interest” until their presence and meetings in both countries are thoroughly investigated and fully explained to the public.
The official story of the shootings cannot, at this point, be accepted at face value. Unless an explanation comes forth that contains more commonsense, and far less nonsense, one will have to conclude that what the public so far has been told is a lie, and the Christchurch attack, like the Las Vegas attack in the United States, was sponsored by forces antithetical to individual rights, free speech, and the ability of people to defend themselves against the armed terrorists who are on the payrolls of the Democratic party and its sister parties around the world, especially in the English-speaking world.
To cap off this badly played farce, New Zealand Prime Minister Ardern – the female complement to Barack Obama – decides to take immediate, savage, and Obama-like political advantage of fifty dead Muslims even before their blood congeals. Because of the attack, she announces her intention to disarm New Zealanders; the media say that some Kiwi patsies have already surrendered their weapons. Ardern, thank God, looks likely to have a pretty quick end to her political career. This dimwit wants to disarm her countrymen at precisely the moment when the country must begin preparing for a near-certain and major Islamist attack in New Zealand. If anyone thinks the Islamic State, al-Qaeda, or East Asia-based Islamist groups will fail to avenge the Muslims’ murder with an attack on New Zealand’s people and interests, they could be sold a pyramid or a warehouse full of 2016 Hillary Clinton for president posters.
Ardern also has asked the next G-20 meeting to take measures that would amount to the international censoring of articles and sites on the internet and social media that G-20 leaders and their advisers deem dangerous. You can bet your last dollar that any such effort would yield regulations to exterminate the presence of conservative, anti-establishment, and anti-globalist commentators, as well as global-warming skeptics, from the internet and social media, while protecting the advocates of each of those causes. In simple terms, if Ardern succeeds, the fascists win.
For the countries and peoples of English-speaking world, it is more important than ever before that the citizenry be as heavily armed as possible. Never before have they encountered as powerful and self-avowed domestic enemy of their freedoms, civil liberties, traditions, histories, religions, and language as they now face from those who call themselves “Progressives”. If the time comes to definitively end this growing progressive oppression, armed citizens will find that targets are both plentiful and more than deserving of being sent to eternal pain.
