Michael Scheuer | Non-Intervention

Let us start with a three-paragraph quotation from a co-authored book review in the March, 2024, issue of an unclassified CIA publication:

“The third and final section focuses on the roles women
played in identifying Usama bin Laden and al-Qaida
as serious threats to the United States and in bringing
about their destruction. Counterterrorism pathfinders
such as Cindy Store, Gina Bennett, and Barbara Sued
feature prominently, as do others like Jennifer Matthews
and Alfred Bukowski. Mundy describes in painstaking
and frustrating detail how first Bennett and Store, then
others, tried largely in vain to convince US officials of
the threat Bin Laden posed, the creation of a dedicated
team at CIA focused entirely on him and al-Qaida, and
the events leading up to 9/11 and the days that followed.

The Bin Laden unit, named Alec Station after the son of
its founding director, Michael Scheuer, represented an
uncomfortable merger between operations and analysis,
and targeting—man hunting—was then something that
the CIA had little experience with. It did not help that
Scheuer—an ally and advocate for the women on his
team—was himself an analyst, leading a DO team staffed
largely by women.”

To Mundy, who accurately describes some difference-
as in the cultures of the DO and DI at that time, it was a
situation that appears in retrospect almost to have been
designed to fail. She is not wrong. Although Scheuer’s
team located bin Laden on a few occasions, it struggled
for years to convince policymakers and CIA leaders of
the unique threat al-Qaida posed, likely due—in part,
at least—to the absence of male operations officers who
would have stood better chances of being heard. Mundy’s
interviewees recount, however, that after 9/11, CIA
completely reconfigured itself to focus on counterterror-
ism, how the prominence of women rose with it, and how
divisions over the proper conduct of what became known
as the global war on terrorism—especially the ethics of
enhanced interrogations—divided even that closely knit
group of officers, men and women alike.” Source: (https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/c252f567841769c88770df3cbfba3200/Review-The-Sisterhood-Studies-68-1-March-2024.pdf)

It is not surprising that today’s CIA has devolved into such a hapless organization and that it is now stupid enough to admit its own accelerating rottenness. In the above article, one of the the authors — a former big-and-tough male operations officer — admits that all of the Americans who died on 9/11 did so because all the big-tough boys in the Directorate of Operations do not deign to consider female CIA officers as their equals, even though female officers beat many of them like a drum and nearly to death on issues related to finding and eliminating Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda. This included the then-Director of Operations, a old Cold Warrior  brought back out of retirement, and who, after firing me, offered me a substantial monetary award if I would agree to lie to my unit by saying I was leaving because I was exhausted. Well, I am never exhausted, and, as gentlemanly as I could, I told him to stick his cash award up his ass. Later, I had to sign a form reaffirming that I had turned down what clearly was no more than the Cold Warrior’s offer of a bribe for silence.

This elderly fellow and his lieutenants on the Agency’s 7th Floor hated the idea that an important CIA unit had a majority — a big one — of female officers working in it. They thought that there were not nearly enough big-and-tough male officers like themselves therein. The review considered here admits the turth on that point. The unit also had a chief –me — who only worked most, not all, of his Agency career in the Directorate of Operations, always in covert operations, and the recipient of only three of the Directorate of Operations’ highest awards. One of the article’s co-authors, the so-called “historian” Brent Geary, is, of course, a former operations officer whose prose suggests he has been ingrained from his first day at the “Farm” with the traditional women-suck-at-operations ideology.

There is a second section of this review that is written by a former CIA officer named Linda Weissgold, who once was Chief of the Agency’s Directorate of Analysis. She turns out to be the typical protect-your-butt and those of the 7^th Floor bureaucrats CIA officer. She softly disagrees with her male co-author by saying that she cannot “bring herself to defend the truth of the fact that 3,000 Americans died on 9/11 because the truth to stop that event was brought to CIA’s top leaders by women.” Why is this, Ms. Weissgold? Because, she writes, “Director George Tenet’s well-documented efforts to get policymakers to act belies claims that the analysts’ warnings went unheeded.”

Now, there doubtless  are such documents, all written or dictated by DCI George Tenet  after he returned from National Security Council meetings or other such senior decision-making forums. If  the “well-documented” heroics of Tenet really exist, they primarily exist as self-serving lies. Most often Tenet went into decision-making senior meetings alone or with a lawyer; that is, with no one who knew more than a superficial amount about bin Laden or Afghanistan or the strengths and weaknesses of the intelligence reporting.Tenet always was briefed on the latest reporting before he went to such meetings and it was always stressed to him that the intelligence was solid as possible, and unlikely to get much better what he had at present. On his return, Tenet never failed to say he had expressed this warning to his fellow attendees.

Instead of acting on this data, Tenet appears to have done all he could to avoid being the person responsible for championing a lethal attack on bin Laden. Then, late in the game, he came up with the dire need for a so-called “second thread” of intelligence to confirm the already clearly accurate intelligence that had been gathered across the CIA by both women and men, working at home and overseas. He suggested, and his political and military masters agreed, that, as good former colonials, Britain’s MI6 must be asked to provide a “second thread’ of intelligence to confirm the work of lowly Americans. Ever the good colonials –always believing the Mother Country better at intelligence work than America — they also probably offered to pay MI6’s expenses, a not unusual practice. The British, of course, came up with nothing. And so, Tenet, his lieutenants, and their political and military masters — Osama bin Laden could have had no better protectors — refused to listen to the work of mere female CIA officers. Time then continued its gentle, quiet, and undisturbed travel to the day 3,000 Americans died unnecessary because their government refused to try to terminate the threat it knew was coming for them.

Why? Because, in large measure, female officers had played the key role in understanding and exploiting the CIA-produced intelligence that repeatedly gave Tenet and his political masters a series of near-certain death-shots at bin Laden. The senior big-and-tough Directorate of Operations’ lads couldn’t bear the thought that women and not men had delivered the goods, and so they questioned the quality of their own agency’s intelligence capabilities when speaking with their political and military masters. The latter were all Clinton appointees and probably shared of his well-known views of women what they were good for.

Co-author Ms. Weissgold also throws in a good deal of clutter and fluff about how hard it is to work in bureaucracies and with politicians, but her section fails to accept the fact — as did Geary’s — that Tenet and other senior, mostly male CIA leaders completely failed America on 9/11, and all because that bunch of self-servers consistently undercut, denigrated, and deliberately underrated the abilities of female intelligence officers, not just in Alec Station but, in my view, across the CIA. Indeed, Tenet, his lieutenants, and senior political leaders never once — despite at least 10 chances — tried to kill bin Laden between December 1994 and 11 September 2001. Why did they want Americans dead?

Finally, the point of these comments is not only to mark the on-going decline of the CIA — intentionally started by Clinton, continued by Brennan under Obama’s orders, and now accelerated by Biden’s regime — but also to comment on Agency’s stark inability to look at itself and see its many self-inflicted failures, as in the 9/11 case. It was the senior Agency leaderships’ arrogance, jealousy of female success, and resentment of that consistent success, that knowingly cost thousands of American deaths that could have been prevented. The content of the book review also seems to amount to an honest admission – a former acting DCI is on the editorial board approving its publication — that senior Agency leaders’ still take pride in underestimating female capabilities and, in that way, at least, reaffirms continued abusive institutional treatment of female officers both as lesser folk and, perhaps, as a proper reason to have at them at hand for blame when another 9/11 disaster occurs

The terrorist attack in Moscow on 22 March 2024 is being identified as an operation conducted by Islamic State-K, a branch of ISIS based in Afghanistan. That is not impossible, but on the basis of initial reporting its seems quite unlikely. Indeed, media reports seem unprecedentedly specific and detailed for a rushed, as-it-unfolds media story, almost as if the stories were complete weeks ago and stood ready for release. As a rule, that is not the how initial reports on terrorist attacks work. Confusion is usually the order of the day. Several other supporting reasons for this claim follow:

–The first photos of the four shooters surely do not suggest they are Afghans, or Arabs, or Muslims from outside the Muslim world, say in Asia or Africa. Of course, they may be Muslim-converts from Ukraine, elsewhere in Eastern Europe, or the North Caucuses, so their appearances may be deceiving.

–Also, blaming ISIS or any other Islamist group right off the bat would, as always, allow the Israel-owned, uni-party dominated U.S. Congress and the governments allied with it to greatly expand their military help for Israel by starting to bombard many places in the Middle East in the name of “stopping terrorism” by destroying ISIS bases and “sympathizers”. This is an old trick, and often works.

–Experience with similar ISIS shootings in Europe and elsewhere usually showed that the shooters have little or no interest in escaping. They shoot until the responding forces kill them or until they are out of ammunition. The reporting at this hour suggests they intended to escape, had a car nearby for that purpose, and were caught by the police as they were to trying to get away.

–The reporting also suggests that – in a manner nearing the miraculous — the shooters we are able to place explosives in the auditorium’s ceiling in an attempt to cause its collapse onto the captive audience. Commonsense suggests that the attacks and the placing of explosives probably could not have occurred seriatim on the same day.

–Biden’s regime is reported to have earlier warned Putin’s government that ISIS intends to soon stage attack in Moscow. Now Biden’s administration and its military and intelligence chiefs are rotten, stinking, amateurish cretins who hate Russia with a passion, ditto for the sickening dirt-bags that run, at least, the British, French, Ukrainian, and Israeli governments and their military and intelligence services. Indeed, all of these governments and their military and intelligence leaders operate with war-loving minds powered by a demented hatred of post-Soviet Russia. They may have warned the Russians of a coming ISIS attack, one they had already planned, funded, and for which they provided training, weapons, and explosives and – given their blinding hatred for Russia – were demented enough to believe Putin would accept their early warning without question as proof they were not involved in the attack. Unlike themselves, though, Putin is not a stupid jackass. He is rather a talented leader who stands head-and-shoulders, in terms brain-power, truthfulness, patriotism, and patience, above any of the U.S., NATO, or EU leaders

–Then there is the round-the-clock, preparatory presence of the term “Black Swan Event” in almost all Western media controlled by the Biden regime and its gangster partners at the UN and in EU/NATO member governments. Those governments specialize in using their media slaves to make barely disguised announcements about how they next intend to maim, poison, or kill some of their nations’ inhabitants. Perhaps the Biden administration is going to execute dual Black Swan events, first in Moscow and then a biochemical attack on the millions of Americans who plan to gather together in large groups to watch an eclipse on April 8^th, an event for which Israel-Firster Mayorkas’s Department of Homeland is deploying National Guard units and DHS forces to “protect” the eclipse watchers. Yup, they will protect them alright, in the same way the murderous Biden regime “protected” Americans from the Chinese-made flu, that is by drowning them in it.

–Next, the Taliban, not ISIS-K, governs Afghanistan, and ISIS-K is, at best, an unwelcome guest that resides in the country at the Taliban’s pleasure. There is, of course, the possibility that ISIS cooperated secretly with the above-noted governments in a way that left the Taliban regime in the dark. If so, and if ISIS-K staged the attack, ISIS now will have hell to pay with nowhere to go to evade the retribution. There also is another clear possibility. The Biden government may have fled Afghanistan like scared-to-death school girls – after getting thirteen Marines killed and abandoning  a strategic airbase at Bagram and $80-plus billion in top-shelf weaponry – as the price of securing the Taliban’s agreement for help in executing undefined future requirements. This possibility admittedly is a long-shot, but Afghanistan is, without the question, the one place on earth where you should never say never. And, such is the evilness and war-eagerness of the current U.S. government that you can never say never about its possible future criminal actions.

The foregoing is a first analysis by an aging former intelligence officer using the initial tranches of data about the attack on Russian civilians in Moscow. It certainly could be well short of the mark. That said, this CIA has-been believes that, in the history of our republic, Americans have never faced a more hate-filled, diabolical, war-wanting, and death-loving national government – exceeding even the national regimes of Hirohito, Hitler, and the Bolsheviks — which is now led by the traitor Biden and supported by his criminal family, his vicious regime, the bipartisan, Israel-owned, clown-town called Congress, and their European and Israeli friends. That deranged lot want all patriotic citizens dead or enslaved as soon possible. A full war with Russia would turn the trick, killing most of us and easing the enslavement of the remnant.

For now, stay tuned, keep an eye peeled, remain skeptical, rely on commonsense, buy additional weapons/ammo, and pray. For Christians, it is worth noting that the Moscow attack coincided with the celebration of Palm Sunday weekend, another fact that would tend to finger Islamists in the minds of many. Also, please stay home, avoid DHS’s eclipse death-trap, and wait for videos of the eclipse. Better safe at home than sorry and dead.

The videos out today of illegal aliens busting through a “defensive” position of Texas forces, while the don’t-mess-with Texans back away and fire not a shot, are angering and pathetic. The Texans allowed the criminal illegal aliens, members of a force assembled and paid for by the UN, the U.S. government, the Congress, the EU regimes, NATO governments, U.S. state governors, and domestic-and-foreign NGOs — including the Red Cross and a prominent America-hating Israeli NGO that the traitor Mayorkas use to boss — to enter the United States to murder citizens, especially whites; destroy their society; and further speed the demise of their already fading future.

We ought to face facts and  from now on and respond to these illegal animals with focused lethality. The illegals, apparently all men, who busted through the Texans’ farcical defensive line — where are Sam Hood’s Texas regiments when you need them? — are absolutely no different than the Imperial Japanese  regiments that tried to evict the 1st Marine Division (the “Old Breed”) from its bloodily clawed-for foothold on Guadalcanal. Just as Imperial Japan’s Army tried to destroy America’s guardians and then the republic itself, the illegal aliens not looking for a “new start in life — a disgusting lie of a phrase — but rather a clear-cut victory. The men in these alien hordes are the paid agents and ofren trained soldiers of the enemies of America, who are noted above. As those sainted Marines had no choice on Guadalcanal — or on any other Pacific island — America’s fighters now have no choice save opening fire with an unending fury until the American terrain trod by male illegal aliens resembles the Guadalcanal terrain trod by attacking by Japanese soldiers until  that ground stood quiet and beautifully littered with bountiful mounds of the Emperor’s dead soldiers.

The time has come for lethal-as-necessary defensive operations from the men and women of the U.S. Marine Corps, whatever loyal members remain among U.S. veterans and the National Guard, patriots from state-and-local police organizations, qualified citizen volunteers, and from the men and women who remain loyal in the other U.S. armed services — and less likely — from the service academies. A laser focus on killing as many illegal-alien males as possible — especially Chinese — wherever they can be found now seems the only means of restoring the dying republic.

On the bright side, there will be no problem finding illegal-alien males who merit killing. We are in much the same position — thanks to the slug Biden and his fellow, mostly American and European globalist gangsters — as USMC General Lewis “Chesty” Puller found himself and his forces during the Korean War. When told by a subordinate that his Marines were surrounded, Puller reputedly said “Those poor bastards. They’ve got us right where we want ’em. We can shoot in every direction now.”

Last week’s State of the Union Message was perhaps the most notable of its kind. Biden stood before the American people as a drugged-up loser, gangster, phenomenal liar, war-monger, and career-long failure, who able to make the annual address only because his party rigged and so stole the 2020 election.

Biden during the duration of his speech lectured the great bulk of Americans on their many faults, not least of which is failing to recognize the non-existent Biden-economic-miracle that his administration had delivered for the benefit of all working Americans. Carrying on, Biden then told Americans why they should love the war in Ukraine as he, his party and most Republicans do, and rejoice at forking over another $46 billion to the government of a sexually depraved drug addict so he can conscript and kill the remaining Ukrainian males under sixty and send them to a pointless death. Then he severely chastised Americans – especially rural Christian Americans and Christian nationalists, who his lying gangster of an Attorney General has named as DOJ’s main terrorist target — for not eagerly and joyously opening their hearts, homes, minds, and children to the rampant depravity, criminality, and grooming by the Democrats’ beloved LBGT cretins and – increasingly – to the party’s new source of savage slaves and contract mercenaries found in the waves of illegal aliens entering the United States and  picking up gift cards worth many thousands of dollars, paid for by American taxpayers who cannot – thanks to Biden, his Party, and most Republicans – make their own ends meet. Biden, in this speech, clinched the lasting reputation of being the most deceitful, patently crazy, untalented, atheistic, and scoundrel-like president in the republic’s history. Truly, Biden is, in every sense, an abusive, witless, boorish, and, most of all, poorly bred man.

On the issue of Putin and Russia, Biden once again sang the same war-wanting song. He, his party, and most Republicans continue to spread lies about Putin’s “clear intention” to take all of Europe if Moscow is not stopped in Ukraine. The creaking, almost-dead, and far-from mighty NATO alliance’s spokesmen continue to claim that Putin hungers for control of all Europe and its population, even though those peoples are on the verge of rebelling against the EU’s continual raping of their countries via illegal immigration from Africa and the Middle East, its governments’ protection of Muslim groomers, rapists, and Islamist fighters, the EU’s torturing of European farmers by using the untrue and clearly anti-scientific commandments of the climate- change fraud, and the mass eradication of humans it plans to deliver as soon as possible. Why would Putin, or any other human being with an IQ higher than 40, want to take over an angry, continent-wide population seething with hatred for its rulers and their institutions after being abused to an extent never before achieved by so-called “democratic governments”? One can only hope that much of the flood U.S.-and-NATO weaponry that Ukraine is selling to international gun runners – some of them Ukrainians — ends up in the hands of European citizens – and Canadians, Australians, and New Zealanders — who can use them to free themselves from the accelerating enslavement being created by the EU and its component regimes.

On a subject that should be return raised and debated much more frequently, it must be said that the resolute failure of the leaders of the republic’s Christian religions to instruct their flocks on the existence of absolute, murderous evil in their national and many state governments and the country’s NGOs – many, sadly, sponsored by Christians. This has been a lasting and almost indelible disgrace, and was made more so with the threats to the faith uttered by Biden. These pious men and women have not only failed to inform, but appear to have no intention of either  doing so or offering guidance on how the faithful should respond to protect their families, towns, and faith, as well as to destroy the lethal threat Biden and his allies pose to the republic and the Lord’s faithful in therein This threat is coming to focus especially on America’s rural Christian population which has been identified as terrorists by people who are themselves demonstrably domestic and/or international terrorists, such as Biden, Schumer, Garland, Pelosi, Wray, Mayorkas, Austin, Nuland, the Clintons, the Obamas, the Pope, the EU, the Anti-Defamation League, the United Nations, many hundreds of NGOs, the Southern Poverty Law center, The World Economic Forum, all mainstream media organizations, as well as a goodly number of congressional Republicans who have been sucking on the tit of corruption for an extended period and either have forgotten that there is a God or simply do not give a damn. If there is ever going to be a moment when Christian preachers, bishops, ministers, pastors, and priests realize that the tax exemptions given their churches by the federal government are meant not to promote the freedom and vibrancy of religion, their obedience to God, and the protection of their congregations, it must be today. Christianity has long been an indispensable building block for this republic, and in the history of that construction clergymen – especially Protestant clergyman – have always frankly identified the people, governments, banks, and businesses that have tried to destroy the republic and make slaves of Americans.

For example, a now little-recalled Founder of the American republic, a Boston-based colonial pastor named Jonathan Mayhew, provided the essence of the commonsensical and Christian-basis for overthrowing Britain’s tyrannical rule over its thirteen North American colonies. In January, 1750, Mayhew preached a lengthy sermon, one which John Adams said exerted strong motivation among colonial Americans for a war of independence. In his sermon, Mayhew made an irrefutable, definitive, and scripture-based argument asserting that no people are bound by their faith to obey a government that ignores scripture, ignores the good of society, and persecutes those believing therein. “Let us now trace the apostle’s [St.Paul’s Letter to the Romans] reasoning,” Mayhew told his congregation,

“in favor of submission to the higher powers, a little more particularly and exactly. For by this it will appear, on one hand, how good and conclusive it is, for submission to those rulers who exercise their power in a proper manner: And, on the other, how weak and trifling and unconnected it is, if it be supposed to be meant by the apostle to show the obligation and duty of obedience to tyrannical, oppressive rulers in common with others of a different character.

Those who resist a reasonable and just authority, which is agreeable to the will of God, do really resist the will of God himself; and will, therefore, be punished by him. But how does this prove, that those who resist a lawless, unreasonable power, which is contrary to the will of God, do therein resist the will and ordinance of God?

Thus, upon a careful review of the apostle’s reasoning in this passage, it appears that his arguments to enforce submission, are of such a nature, as to conclude only in favor of submission to such rulers as he himself describes; i.e., such as rule for the good of society, which is the only end of their institution. Common tyrants, and public oppressors, are not entitled to obedience from their subjects, by virtue of anything here laid down by the inspired apostle.” (1)

For Americans’ who question the indispensable and pervasive role that Christianity played in the Revolution and its victory, the debates over and drafting of all of the republic’s founding documents, and in establishing – within those documents — the permanency of the statements that the president’s major role is, with the Congress, the protection and victory of the republic armed forces in times of wars authorized by the Constitution’s provisions (thus, there has not  been a Constitutional U.S. War since Japan’s defeat in 1945); the execution of all of the laws, not only those he and his party choose to act upon; and, most importantly, to consistently and resolutely govern in a manner that shows the president’s administration accepts, as both fact and law, that the natural rights of all Americans – as outlined in the Constitution and Bill of Rights — are gifts from God and are never privileges awarded by any national government, and that those natural rights are, under the Founder’s Constitution, the durable and irreversible core of American law and the republic’s freedom, liberty, and civil rights.

The main problem preventing far too many Americans – sadly including many, many Americans and their pastors and priests who identify as Christians – lies in their having traveled to maturity by proceeding through an educational system founded on the national-government’s policy that the learner’s reliable ignorance of truth is both a joy and the proper input for those soon-to-be slaves. The same government’s nationwide in-house mass media, at least five presidents who used their only distinguishable talents for entrenching personal greed, national corruption, tyranny, and dozens of one-man-made wars – Johnson, Clinton, two Bushes, Obama, and Biden. This gang of crooks and other presidents – such as Lincoln, Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, and Truman – consistently demonstrated in their spoken intentions and executive actions, nothing more than a superficial, only for presidential-campaigns, knowledge of the nation’s founding principles and its peoples’ God-given natural rights, by which governance in the United States is both bound and limited.

These presidents and their lieutenants knew their criminal goals could only be achieved via the creation of a consolidated national government that exercised central control over the sovereign states that drafted and signed, and then campaigned to convince voters to surrender a portion of each state’s sovereign powers to the national government. Several of those states also surrendered enormous tracts of land to federal control. They did this in the name of creating a new Union that would be governed for the equal benefit all component members.

At that time, each state also knew that there was nothing in the newly minted Constitution that forbid one or several state legislatures from reclaiming the powers they had given to national government, thereby restoring its own sovereignty in cases where the republic’s government had become dictatorial, corrupt, or simply lawless. Secession was, and still is, constitutional. Indeed, seceding from the Union today would be no different than the American colonies declaring their secession from the British Empire, defeating Britain’s armed might, and then forming the republic. Nor would such an action today differ from that of Confederate States of America in 1861, when southern states announced their secession to the world, and retrieved the powers its states surrendered to the national government in 1789, formed a new republic, and then waged a war of independence which sought to protect a wide-range of vital regional, economic, social, and legal issues – which included slavery, but was nowhere near dominated by the subject — against a Lincoln-ordered military invasion of the south.

There was in 1789, and there is not today, a single word in the U.S. Constitution or the Bill of Rights that can be defined as a bar against states’ seceding from a republic grown corrupt, war-mad, authoritarian, and lawless, as is Biden’s. [2] There also is no doubt that the Constitution, in 1789, would have failed ratification if the states’ legislatures and voters believed that they were locking themselves helplessly and permanently into rule by a federal government as corrupt and anti-constitutional as either the King’s or Biden’s. The exit option also is shown to have been understood by the signing states by the fact that the Constitutional Convention did not – as did its predecessor, the framers of the Articles of Confederation – include any ban on secession, deliberately leaving out the Articles’ clearly stating assertion that the signers thereof were pledging to form and maintain a “Perpetual Union”. [3] The viability of secession also seems supported by the fact that none of the Civil War-era’s constitutional amendments mentioned, argued, or stated that the Union victory had settled the impossibility of secession one for all. A final and despicable example that shows secession to be a legitimate tool for fleeing tyranny, one that can only be blocked by war, is found in Biden’s witless, arrogant, and no-quarter dare to Americans to secede and see how they would fare against F-16’s, nuclear weapons, and, implicitly, another deliberate pandemic using biological warfare weapons against all Americans.

Overall, in his shameful State of the Union Speech, Biden proved he is the true heir of – perhaps the king of — the above-sketched breed of presidential miscreants whose common goals, above all, have been to sate their personal greed and corrupt passions, to produce an overwhelming, central-government-driven corruption and suppression of republicanism from Atlantic to Pacific, and the building of an enormously, expensive, powerful, and now corrupt military led by flag officers eager to lead armies into unnecessary, interventionist wars and death, while knowing that their commander-in chief had no intention of winning any of the wars, aiming instead to stay deployed long enough to gain all economic plunder available and to burnish the presidential war-makers’ best loved title as “Leader of the Free World,” even as they surreptitiously labor to win the same title with the word ‘free” deleted.

Notes: 

–1.) Eric Patterson, “Jonathan Mayhew: Colonial Pastor against Tyranny.” Providence Magazine, October 2020, https://providencemag.com/2020/10/jonathan-mayhew-colonial-pastor-against-tyranny/ The excerpts from the sermon are drown the passages quoted in Mr. Patterson’s essay. Mayhew’s sermon is titled: “A Discourse Concerning the Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to Higher Authorities. With some Reflections on the Resistance made to King Charles I ” and also are found in the full copy of the entire sermon, which is available at  https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=etas; an inexpensive bound copy of the sermon is available at Amazon.com, https://www.amazon.com/Discourse-Concerning-Unlimited-Submission-Non-resistance/dp/1500445916/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3DY3ZYHY6X8E2&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.xHfOfBvJak7BKsg6u5TufyGg_ViF4pwZ-2fHr4YIxQFrkoIqWpCwktoUluj9Xm25wItqCKxv1TYo_oAPeb3OxH4EEbGpKuZFaJ8mjOxsdxJ95tvpmgSuJPo4PPM-pMt3vcyuFG4nZk_Gwb7hJZywAsjBirEM3OzF9u3kCf2XGkPkOZXP8DiPtvAzn_Mbsv1JA3jaW1tJuzFKcx9O-CAbuNZbrq3Arthd5UjNjZb8uuE.ygb4wTaEyXphf-pwFh7sxIgHN3WDRGRcLgoPVkDFdLA&dib_tag=se&keywords=jonathan+mayhew&qid=1709991874&s=books&sprefix=jonathan+mayhew%2Cstripbooks%2C73&sr=1-1. The best biography of Mayhew is Patrick Mullins. Father of Liberty: Jonathan Mayhew and the Principles of the American Revolution, University Press of Kansas, 2017. An older biography of Mayhew that still amply rewards a close reading is: Charles W. Akers. Called unto Liberty: A Life of Jonathan Mayhew, Boston: Harvard University Press, 1964.

–2.) There is a Supreme Court decision — Texas v. White, 1869 – that argues that once the states joined the Constitution they were –a Lincoln argued — in the Union for good. The argument seems a is a bit sophomoric and almost totally ahistorical. Written by Chief Justice Solman P. Chare – Lincoln’s Secretary of the Treasury — for the majority, Chase lays out Lincoln’s view of the Union pretty thick, in essence describing it as a trap that when snapped shut, was shut for good. At the end of the decision, however, Chase doubles back a bit and argues, “The Constitution, in all of its provisions, looks to the indestructible Union, composed of indestructible states…” Oddly, Chase and the majority seem not to have recalled that Lincoln’s armies did destroy the seceding states, and his successors in the Court, Congress, and presidency kept the south militarily occupied and economically impoverished, the latter for more than a century. See, Texas v. White, 1869, https://sageamericanhistroy.net/civilwar/docs/TexasvWhite.htm

–3. See, “Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union”, 12 July 1776, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/contcong_07-12-76.asp

A correct and urgent question is returning to the public discussion of U.S. foreign policy; namely, why the hell is our republic still in NATO. Trump rather oddly said that he would get out of the alliance if the European gang and Canada did not pay their fair share. Money, of course, should have little to do with propelling us to leave NATO. Commonsense, constitutional requirements, and genuine national interests are the key motivators for our departure.

The truth is that NATO never has stopped a war with Russia. Only the fact of mutually assured destruction via nuclear weapons turned that trick. If NATO did anything, it cold-bloodily provided a tripwire to ensure that a westward military move by Soviet forces would yield plenty of dead American troops in the war’s first hours. In response, as after Pearl Harbor, the patriotic adrenaline of Americans would flow in a torrent, leaving no time to scourge and hang U.S. leaders who signed such a useless and unconstitutional alliance, one that left the republic with no option but war. What American leader in his right mind would put Americans at risk of participating in a third — and final – world war, after the enormous amounts of blood, money, and degraded civil liberties that were spent saving the Europeans in two earlier world wars. In both wars, American interests would have been best served if we had politely but adamantly abstained from that pair of traditional and wearisome European blood-lettings.

Trump probably should not have said he would urge Russia to go after NATO when America gives the alliance the boot. This was unnecessary. Trump knows that Putin has made it pretty clear that he wants no part of Europe’s weak-kneed, atheistic, government-dependent, multicultural, and increasingly mongrel population, which, like too many Americans, is too cowardly to stand up and fight off domestic regimes that are stripping them of everything from their history, national pride, and work ethic, to their faith, localism, children, and heritage of liberty, much of which Putin himself has spent the past quarter-century trying to restore in Russia. Being a sharp lad, Putin also sees that the NATO nations and the United States are murdering themselves; why would Russia decide to get in the way of their accelerating self-destruction?

On this issue, Trump has also – intentionally or not – misled Americans. The United States should leave NATO for two reasons, neither of which is solely monetary.

–(a.) The first has to do national character. NATO has 28 countries that lack the national pride and sense of responsibility to pay and sacrifice for their own defense, and which have militaries that have long since proven they cannot fight worth a good damn. Like the U.S. military, they are led by woke generals who have grown rich, arrogant, and contemptuous of their troops by bending-over and obeying extravagantly wealthy politicians who hate the nation-state, and – with the flag officers’ help — weaken it at every turn. U.S. and NATO generals in Iraq, Afghanistan, and now as they do Israel’s bidding against the mighty Huthis, have demonstrated that they are nowhere near fit – physically or mentally — to win a war against even much-lesser enemies. Any U.S. funding for NATO since the fall of the Soviet Union has been wasted and or grifted by its European recipients and their generals. Money cannot buy or strengthen character.

–b.) America has played the nurse-maid and guardian of Europe’s drift toward decadence and authoritarianism since 1917. This assistance has not helped a lick in getting the elites of those states to regain their manliness, self-reliance, and a proud and stubborn sense of the importance of unflagging nationalism. I had a professor who once said that “Britain and probably all Europe died on the Somme in 1916, though the death will take long to recognize.” These days, America too is dying, and perhaps one day someone will accurately claim that “the republic died on the Rio Grande” from a suicide arranged by its grinning and depraved governing elite. Until the coroners confirm America’s own death, let us get out of NATO and let Europe fend for itself while its corpse stinks ever more strongly and its death is finally clear to all.

Several readers have written to ask if i am an expert on man-made climate change by education or avocation. The answer is certainly not.  My grounding in that subject is two facts, that are only refuted by man-made climate chance fraudsters.

–1.) Without carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, life on earth is impossible, and  at the moment, we have too little, not too much Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere and so crops are therefore much less bountiful than they could be, and so more people are hungry worldwide.

–2.) The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA) and the National Air and Space Administration (NASA) have for more than a decade been rewriting their records and then supplying the newly bogus data to support the fake climate scientists who are paid to lie by many world governments, including that of the United States, to make claims, that are scientifically unsupported, “proving” a man-made climate catastrophe is nearing.

That’s my minimal background in man-made climate change matters. Fortunately, for about a decade I have been following a courageous and genuine climate expert named Tony Heller. What I know and speak about regarding this issue comes from him and several other brave scientists like him. In my appraisal, Mr. Heller has been and is proving, day by day, that the advocates of catastrophic man-made climate change are anti-science, anti-climate, anti-humanity, and lying gangsters, as are the UN, the WEF and the member governments supporting each. The only aim aim of this lying gaggle is to attain dominant wealth and worldwide coercive power and then eliminate multiple billions of human beings.

Mr. Heller has educated me with the detailed-evidence he uses to support his talks, especially useful are the before-and-after falsification graphics of NOAA and NASA documents. There, are of course, hundreds more videos by Mr. Heller to round out the knowledge of those eager to discover the death-threat that hovers over them by learning definitively that the concept of man-made climate change is a rank-and lethal man-made scam as well as an idiocy.

Finally, I should say that I have never met or spoken with Mr. Heller.

Here is a sample of Mr. Heller’s recent talks:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18ec2X4OUaA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-cEYTP-zP0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKz-DmkXoqs

https://www.youtube.com/@TonyHeller

https://www.youtube.com/@TonyHeller

https://www.youtube.com/@TonyHeller

How interesting it is to watch the Israel-owned U.S. Congress deal as if two different political parties actually exist in the United States. One side argues that that there will be no money to close the southern border and save the republic, while the other argues that there will no money for the southern border unless they secure approval for $106 Billion for aid military aid to Israel and Ukraine. That is $106 billion minus the large percentage that would kicked back to the Democratic party and their Republican Rino allies in both houses. When it all washes out, Democrats and most of the Republicans will be winners. they’ll get both the money for Ukraine, Israel and their kickbacks. Then the bureaucracy will be told to administratively tie-up the use the border money for as long as possible, and immediately deliver the military aid to two nation-states who are the slobbering enemies of American taxpayers, their well-being, and the republic’s existence. Americans know that their taxes are used not to strengthen their republic, but to pad the pockets of their elected representatives and fund miserable countries who are useless as allies, corrupt, terminally arrogant,  increasingly depraved, authoritarian and of no strategic consequence to the United States. The also know that U.S. military aid to foreign countries is almost always more likely to start or expand to wars, rather than to keep the piece. After all, this is the story of every war America has waged since 1945, all of which have been lost.

It also wise to recall that the United States has not fought a constitutional war since the Congress performed is exclusive constitutional task and declared war against Japan in December, 1941, this after FDR had spent two or three years maneuvering Imperial Japan into a choice between attacking the United States or collapsing economically. In essence, FDR asked the Congress to declare the war he and his colleagues had purposely fermented. Then, to FDR’s great relief, perhaps even joy, Herr Hitler declared war on the United States a few days after Pearl Harbor. Assisted by Churchill, the British intelligence services, the FBI, his many acolytes in the East Coast elite, in the universities, in the arms industry, and even Supreme Court justice Felix Frankfurter, FDR did much more than just behave in consistently morally corrupt manner, he took actions that were clearly illegal, treasonous, deliberately deceitful, and callously reckless of American lives in an effort to anger Germany into dropping its sturdy aversion to war with the United States.

Hitler for strategic reasons that later proved unsound, and excessive loyalty to his Japanese ally, made FDR’s fondest wish come true, two wars he could oversee and, indeed, dominate, both meant to render a victory that would make his idol Woodrow Wilson’s mad-and-authoritarian dream of a “League of Nations” come true in the creation of the much-madder United Nations, which is now destroying U.S. sovereignty – with the invaluable and always eager help of the Congress and the Executive Branch – to create a world government that has no other goal than attaining the absolute economic, political, and military power that will allow it to eliminate most of humanity.

A final reminder for Americans, and sadly it seems necessary, to examine the past three years, and recognize that Biden and his Cabinet members are the final, most fulsome stage of president-led treason. Indeed, they have so far set the all-time standard for that highest and most despicable type of treason, although both Wilson and FDR merit recognition as close runner-ups to Biden and his gang.

History’s horror stories, of course, cannot be rectified, but there is often some chance that their repetition might be prevented, as long as you don’t buy  into the argument held only by lunatics; namely, that history never repeats itself. Three pieces of commonsense provide the people of the United States with reliable guides to use in ending their republic’s endless involvement in wars that do nothing to defend the United States, but only makes it more hated, more authoritarian, less prosperous, more divided internally, less safe, and an ever greater loser in terms of blood and wealth.

–The first is to refresh our knowledge of and faith in the divine law of the Christian God. For more than a century, the American political establishment has gradually implemented policies that is yielding governmental-made destruction of Christianity. Biden’s slug-filled cabinet now claims that the devout Christians are “terrorists” and they pay agents of a foreign power, like the ADL, to gather data on Christians and supply it to — perhaps in return for 30 pieces of silver — the DOJ, the FBI, and the U.S. military for their coming formal persecution of Christians. For Christians in American, the one thing that must be recovered is the unshakeable fact that all men are fallen creatures and for that reason are equally capable of good and evil. The latter is always easier to perform than the former.

–The second is to refresh our knowledge of man-made law, which the Founders, of course, made in the first place by combining the their own thoughts and ideas, with the words and rules of the Christian God. Although no man or woman is a saint, some appear in human eyes — though God is the final judge — to be irredeemably evil. Take, for instance: the sainted Obama who seems to be mixed up in the killing off his personal chef and who deliberately armed the Mexican cartels; the late Secretary of State Madeline Albright, who reacted with sheer delight at the mention of the 500,000 dead Iraqi children she had helped kill, and the thoroughly mad Senators Graham and McCain, their eternal America-last love for war and Israel, and the many tens  of thousands of  supposed Americans who are cheering for Israel to murder every last Palestinian.

–The third improvement is a the permanent return of a foreign policy  for the United States that has neutrality as a solid and unchangeable core.  Neutrality, of course, is another of the legacies of unfathomable worth that were designed by our Founders. Make neutrality functional again would require the extinction of all of the anti-American and anti-republican international connections that have adhered like blood-suckers to post-1917 U.S. foreign policy. The United States, thank God, is the one nation on earth that need demand or want nothing but fair trade from the rest of the world. Binding political, economic, and military ties to all foreign countries — including the UK, Australia, Israel, and New Zealand — must be ended so that henceforth Americans are absolutely free to decide when and if they want to go to war. A return to neutrality also means the end of U.S. participation in all international associations and international organizations — the UN, NATO, the WTO,  the NWO/WEF, the Paris Climate Treaty Mafia, the EU, etc. — that have the ability to deny Americans their constitutional right to a complete independence of action in all realms of the republic’s international relations.

Dissolving the binding ties to these international associations and organizations also would permit the creation of an immigration policy, based on the interwar immigration laws, that would create annual quotas for the countries from which America agrees to receive a very limited number of immigrants on the basis of their ability and desire to fit in and benefit the republic.

The foregoing discussion is far from complete, but it would be a start from which the United States could with speed remove itself from wars, sanctions, and other international enforcement projects in the name of such nonsense as human rights, women’s rights, abortion rights, the worldwide application of the West’s hideous and increasing sexual depravity, removing bad-guys because the U.S. elite dislike governments, such as Saddam, Gaddafi, and Mullah Omar; the intentionally anti-science and murderous plans to remove carbon dioxide from the environment, and a host of other subjects that demand Americans assist in the forcing sick beliefs and crackpot ideas on themselves on other of the world’s peoples who have done Americans no harm, are not positioned to do so, and who would likely be friends of the republic if we were not always hectoring them, intervening in their affairs, laughing at them, deriding their faiths, identifying them as evil, or, as often as not, shooting at them.

The absolute need to rid ourselves of these binding international ties and return to neutrality cannot be overemphasized, though they are the making of several of our supposedly greatest leaders, Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Clinton, the two Bushes, and Barack Obama.  These three men were both consummate liars and evil charlatans who never came within spitting range of making the world any safer for democracy. They  unquestionably deliberately did, however, greatly assist Europe’s gangsters and our other poisonous allies in making the world ever-more safe for genocide

Over the past decades, I have spent a good deal of time focused on Osama bin Laden, thinking about what he said and did, and doing a little writing about him and how U.S. leaders methodically ignored the speeches in which he outlined his plans to and did wage war on America. In many ways, the late Al-Qaeda chief remains a man whom I respect as a worthy enemy, as the Allies spoke of Erwin Rommel during the second great war. In some ways, bin Laden, a Muslim, was a throwback to another era, one when the West’s rules of war – especially for America under the U.S. Constitution—required a formal declaration of war by the vote of a parliament or, in America, the Congress. Indeed, one of the most important securities provided to citizens by the U.S. Constitution was to wrap the president so tightly in constitutional chains so that he could never take the republic to war without a formal declaration by Congress, save in case of invasion or imminent attack.

In August, 1996, Osama bin Laden declared war on the United States, giving a long, detailed, and largely truthful analysis – from and al-Qaeda’s perspective, that of many millions of Sunni Islamists, and that of many American non-interventionists – of U.S. actions in the Middle East and the Muslim Word generally, and the motivation they provided – alongside commonsense and Allah’s guidance on self-defense – for war against the United States. For the next five years, the Clinton and Bush II administrations either ignored or ridiculed the idea that one heavily bearded man and his Islamist insurgent group could harm the United States. Both also uniformly chose to do nothing when repeated opportunities to kill or capture bin Laden were provided to them by the CIA and its foreign partners. On this, I can claim some expertise as I led those efforts from 1995-1999. Moreover, no politician or spokesman from either administration – nor anyone in Congress — took time to explain the nature and basis of the threat to the American people. Al-Qaeda’s attack occurred on 11 September 2001. The Bush II administration pretended to be surprised by the attack and the mainstream media and the 9/11 Commission followed the administration’s studied deceit in lockstep. There is still a murkiness about what exactly went on before 9/11, but what is refutably known is that both the Clinton and Bush II administrations had ample and detailed warning about a coming attack and first-rate targeting opportunities, none of which were exploited. In that light, it also seems that the administrations got the war they wanted, one that would give them a huge step forward toward their ultimate goal – the invasion of Iraq.

Suddenly, Sheikh bin Laden has again become the focus of debate in the United States because of a paper he is claimed to have written in November, 2002, which is entitled “To the American People”. Now there are several versions or portions of the 2002 letter now flying about the internet, and there are many sites that carried the original text but have for foolish or cowardly reasons deleted another piece of history. Not confident that I had found the document so many people are agonizing over for unclear reasons, I checked my own files and found a copy of a UBL letter entitled “To the American People” at the top which bin Laden notes that “The subject of my talk to you is the overwhelming control of capital and its effect on the ongoing war between us. I direct my talk specifically to those who support change, especially the youth.” My file copy is undated and today I downloaded a fresh copy from the site of the Director of National Intelligence. (1) There is date-related glitch in the letter’s text that makes it appear to have been written in 2008 vice 2002, but more about that below. Nonetheless, the letter I use in this piece surely and truthfully covers a good deal of important ground, and shows that Osama bin Laden’s perception of where the United States and its society, economy, and future were heading was right on target. At a minimum, if this letter is not the one at the core of the current controversy, it may well add more light and depth to that rather heated discussion.

The crux of the above-mentioned letter lies in its blunt truth-telling about the status of America and its economy and society in 2002 (?), which is so much worse in 2023. Following are six of the points made by bin Laden in the letter I am citing:

–1.) “The tyranny of the control of capital by large companies has harmed your economy, as it has ours, and that was my motivation for this talk. Tens of millions of you are below the poverty line, and millions of you have lost your jobs….”

–2.) “[Y]ou continue to support the oppressive Israelis in the occupation of our [Islam’s] Palestine in response to pressures on your administrations by a Jewish Lobby backed by enormous financial capabilities.”

–3.) “The previous administration was successful in implicating you in these wars against us under the premise that they are necessary for your security or according to the promise that it would be short and would finish in six days or six weeks. Six years has [sic] passed. [Here’s the rub, the war began in 2001 and six years would make the letter’s date 2006, 2007, or even 2008 because he mention’s Obama’s regime in the letter, not 2002], and that administration [Bush’s] is gone without realizing the victory…. If it was the six-day war that started after President Bush, and six years have not been enough to finish it, then wise men should question how long a six-month war would take and whether you are able to fund a war that requires a large amount of money that weakens your economy and your dollar.” (NB: The six-month war lasted 20 years and ended in a humiliating U.S. military defeat and a clown-like military evacuation)

–4.) “The course of the policies of the present administration [Obama’s?] in several areas clearly reveals that whoever enters the White House, even with good intentions to safeguard the peoples’ interest, is no more than a train operator. His only task is to keep the train on the tracks that are laid down by the lobbyists in New York and Washington to serve their interests first, even if it is counter to your security and economy. Any president who tries to move the train from the lobbyist’s tracks to a track for the American peoples’ interests will confront very strong opposition and pressures from the lobbyists.”

–5.) “For the American youth to succeed in this change, they need to relive the history of their ancestors and the conditions in their country more than two centuries ago. They need to understand the similarities during that era and their present situation, especially in their fundamental conditions. The British Parliament sided with corporations, then against the interests of the citizens. You have noticed the Congress’s stand with corporations against the peoples’ interests when they refused to legislate against interference in the elections by corporations. The British military governor in the United States used to have the right to appoint judges and mayors. Similarly, the corruption is deep rooted now in all higher authorities, thus giving authorities over these offices to corporations.”

–6.) “Reading the book by the intellectual Thomas Paine helped your fathers in the revolution against the oppressors. It is useful for you to read it under the current, similar circumstances. You are in need of people like Thomas Paine to publish books pointing out the similarities between the two phases and that will have a similar effect. You also are in need of men with courage and initiative like those of your forefathers at that time when they refused to allow one company to harm the interests of the United States, a company that had a monopoly on tea and its prices. Yet there now are many companies that endanger the United States’ economy, which continues to be vulnerable to collapse and they also formulate the policies of the White House. They threw hundreds of thousands of soldiers against us and have formed an alliance with the Israelis to oppress us and occupy our land; that was the reason for our response on the [September] eleventh.” (2)

With the swirling and angry debate now occurring over demonstrating university-students and non-students who the media and the governing elites claim are being fired up by Bin Laden’s 2002 (?) letter to Americans, it is hard to imagine what why likes of Glenn Beck and Mark Levin are so upset by the truth, and are accompanied by an ADL chief who seems to believe that patriots give a good damn about what he thinks or says. Following are the truthful points as they were outlined in bin Laden’s letter: (a.) the corporations, banks, and foreign and domestic lobbies are calling the shots in the way the U.S. government governs, in making sure the Congress is utterly corrupt, and the endless continuation of unconstitutional interventionist wars; (b.) they insure that we behave as the mindless, automaton-like allies of Israel in endless Jewish-Islam wars in which we have no dog in the fight; (c.) they make sure that pirate-presidents begin wars off their own hook, as the save-its-own-ass Congress builds him into a dictator; and, most important, (d) they have created an educational system that indoctrinates Americans with sexual/gender idiocy, climate nonsense based on fake and money-corrupted science, which provides a mindset that deprecates and even hates the words, actions, and legacies of our founding fathers, Thomas Paine and so many others. These four solid truths spoken by Osama bin Laden in 2002 (?), remain as solidly true but far more damaging then even the Sheik could have imagined when he wrote.

–Endnotes:

–1.) Bin Laden’s “Letter to the American people” can be found, read, and downloaded at https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ubl2016/english/To%20the%20American%20people.pdf

–2.) Bin Laden’s analysis in points 5 and 6 above are correct but understated. They portray a direct threat to the republic’s existence. Since President Truman unconstitutionally took us into the Korean War, all of America’s succeeding wars have not been prefaced by the congressional debate and formal declaration of war required by the Constitution. Most recently the worst-ever U.S. president and his treasonous staffers decided on their own to take the United States into the Ukraine war, as well as to send U.S. forces to help Israel to kill its Muslims foes. America’s military history since Japan’s surrender, in short, amounts to multiple presidential pirates starting wars which most Americans did not want, and then losing each and every one of them. None have been declared by the Congress, instead that toady-filled institution passes a bill called an “Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF)” which unconstitutionally delegates the decision to go to war to whichever over-aged pirate currently occupies the White House. That authorization is meant to do three things: (a) give the president dictatorial powers; (b) allow the Congress to applaud the president if he wins, and damn him to hell if he loses, and, most important, (c) to deny the American people any chance at all to press their elected representatives to vote down, after public debate, a president’s request for a formal declaration of war. The Anglophile, elitist, and power-hungry presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt, and their ultra-pro-British minions and partisan bureaucrats, had the devil’s own time in lying, misleading, and oppressing the overwhelming majority of Americans – who were non-interventionists – into each war, though they wanted neither. After a tough nationwide battle, both administrations ultimately got congressional declarations of war for two world wars. In the wake of those two despicable presidential performances, U.S. politicians decided that there must be no more presidential requests for declarations of war, thereby clearing the path – apparently permanently –  of troublesome anti-war voters, and starting both limitless presidential wars and the steady flow of kickbacks to the Congress, the federal bureaucracy, and the White House from war-loving lobbies, defense contractors, and now foreign governments. It also has led, brick by brick, to the construction of tyrannical rule in the United States, a project that is now edging toward completion.

It begins, again, to look like an episode of a long-running  freak show that sees Israel and Palestine putting America at the brink of war, long after they and their American supporters have destroyed the reputation of the United States for even-handedness foreign affairs, and now further strengthen the world’s belief that the United States supports to-the-hilt the ghastly conduct of supposedly allied countries like Israel, Palestine, and Ukraine. In truth, though, the fatal fault lies only on the United States president, Congress, bureaucracy, military, and media as there seems not to be more than a dozen men and women in that entire mass of detritus that gives a good damn about U.S. security and the safety of Americans.

Since Truman recognized Israel because he needed money for a presidential campaign, the United States — and especially its double-passported Congress, media, and Jewish-American community – have shaped the republic in only one direction; namely to make it become Israel’s bottomless treasury and monster defender whenever the Israeli government snaps its fingers. It also ensures that the whole world knows that America literally is Israel’s Daddy Warbucks, one that has money but neither backbone nor brain. To identify the American republic as being independent is, today, utter, lying nonsense. How can it be independent when all it takes are orders from Israel instructing America that its wartime, and to initiate the march of American military forces toward the Middle East?

Between Israel and NATO the idea of an independent America, free to decide for itself when it will act internationally and when it will not, is a purely ridiculous assertion, a nonsense. The fact is that the definition of our-war making power lies not in acting according to the Constitution and doing what is best for the United States – which almost always would be a quick decision to resolutely stay at home – but rather to surrender the republic to the control to the likes of Israeli leaders, spokesmen, and Jewish-Americans, the latter threatening to withdraw their donations to schools because some students support Palestinians. Americans also simultaneously run a daily risk that one of the many small and feckless NATO governments will get into a military jam that means automatic war for America. In such case, America immediately begins a must-be-fought war because the North Atlantic treaty has made the republic both the pawn of Western European politics and the longtime funder for the defense of the World’s most woke, week-kneed, and anti-military region.

And where are the mighty Arab leaders? Well, they are where they always have been, sitting on their thrones in presidential or royal palaces, pushing money to Palestine to ease their consciences, while condemning the United States and Israel for killing “poor Palestinians” (or Lebanese, Iranians, or Syrians, or whoever Israel marks as its target of the month). The Arabs will do anything they can to defend the Palestinians, so long as its causes themselves no harm, physical discomfort, unwanted immigration, or undo effort, which amounts – per their own words — to a sort of a Koran-be-damned attitude. Look at a map of the region for a moment and ask why the enormous Arab and Muslim world has failed for 75 years to solve Palestine’s problems with Israel by force or by holding the world hostage via their oil weapon? The answer of course is that the Arab and Muslim governments – like Israel and NATO governments – see the United States government as always ready to play the tied-down-like-Gulliver sucker. That is just a too perfect and hilarious scene for them to tamper with. As long as the republic remains obedient by staying at the end of Israel’s short-leash, and as long as Israel keeps the U.S. Congress, media, and bureaucracy suborned, the Arab leaders can forever preach hatred for Israel, love for the Palestinians, and damnation for the Americans, while all the while hanging around their palaces and living the good life to extreme excess.

The bottom line is that mindless American support for Israel begins to be ingrained in young Americans even before high school. That idea is based on a media-built vision of Israel as a “struggling democracy” and “our only ally”, in the Middle East. In this scenario it is a country surrounded by hate-filled – though militarily impotent – Arab states, and thus the United States must always remain the mighty protector of this “tiny democracy”. No questions asked. To complement this theme – at least when I was a kid, perhaps not now – history teachers showed accurate films about the terrors of the Nazi camps, with the second purpose of instilling pity and love for Israel in naïve children. Thus, in my day, this was the start of mind-controlled adults, ever ready to acquiesce to Israel’s demands. It worked well for a good many years, until the Democrats decided to punish Israel and Jews generally by using their professorial ideologues to teach hate for Israel and love for Palestinians and other terrorists, like the party’s very own BLM and ANTIFA. Somewhere along the line, Israeli and Jewish-American leaders lost the thread, failing to see that their donations were being used to pay for the Democrats’ inculcation of anti-Semitism and production of their most important product … hate.

The United States government, under the Constitution, has never had a genuine and binding obligation to defend any nation but its own; other countries and people are not in its purview, unless there is foreign intervention with intent to seize control of territory in the Western Hemisphere. (NB: Our elites, however, have sidestepped their duty under the Constitution, the Monroe Doctrine and commonsense by allowing China to economically throttle the countries south of the Rio Grande.) Despite that constitutional fact, the U.S. government has signed and ratified treaties like the North Atlantic Treaty that created NATO, which, on its face, is unconstitutional because it negates the ability of the Congress to fulfill its sole constitutional responsibility to decide if, when, and against whom the United States will go to war. Truman’s administration and the Congress, of course, signed and ratified the NATO Treaty as much to defend the U.S. government and presidential wars against the will of its own people as to confront the USSR. The treaty was meant to ensure that future American presidents would not – like Franklin Roosevelt – have to be harassed by a pesky and always overwhelming majority of Americans who resolutely oppose the wars for which the sainted FDR and his close associates were panting.

So ardently did FDR and his boys want war that they used economic sanctions to maneuver Japan into a choice between war and complete economic oblivion. The Japanese obligingly did the necessary in spades, on 7 December 1941, and naturally turned America into a country rabid for war, and rightly so. Few of today’s Americans, however, know that in the weeks preceding Pearl Harbor, nationwide polls continued to show seventy-to-eighty percent of Americans opposed any foreign war, this even after they were being attacked by FDR, his cabinet, the FBI and their allies in the British government and security services, which were working independently and covertly in America, with FDR’s okay. The activities of these beauties were intended to break the back of the non-interventionist movement; that is the ant-war will of the American people. For three years before Pearl Harbor that unholy alliance had been waging war to discredit non-interventionists as Pacifists, Nazis, mentally ill, and anti-Americans. FDR’s deceit, illegality, adoration of Britain and its traditional wickedness, and something near treason turned the trick. He got the war he wanted, and Hitler helped him by declaring war on the United States. With Pearl Harbor. the American people seemingly lost forever their right to effectively oppose and so stop a president determined to go to war just because he wants to and does so in violation of the Constitution. Again, the proof of that lies in the treaty that produced NATO. If little Moldova is attacked early tomorrow morning, the United States would be at war before most people had their breakfast and heard the news. It would be yet another Presidential War, which in no way can be identified as a legitimate American war.

Today, Americans see that several carrier task groups, thousands of Marines, sailors, airmen, and soldiers, scads of military aircraft, and many billions of dollars are being sent to the Middle East so the republic can once again play lapdog and do Israel’s bidding against the Palestinian horde the Israel’s are seeking to obliterate from the earth. Another fool’s errand, more dead and maimed U.S. military personnel, and perhaps a nuclear war. If Israel does not scour Hamas from the scene, the remnants of Hamas will regroup, feed of the money and military resources of the Arabs, Persians, and others to rebuild, and before long the United States will be giving increased aid to the Israelis and playing the role of a brain-dead military automaton, like a rich old Dad who forever goes to the rescue of an errant child who can never seem to grow up or care for his own. What’s the point? The continued existence of Israel is about as low on the totem pole of genuine U.S. national-security interests as you can get; perhaps only Ukraine and Palestine could be lower.

The bottom line for America is to stop doing things in the foreign-policy realm that do not matter, unnecessarily risk war, or are just plain stupid. As a nation, we are now flush with all three. The security of the United States is not dependent on the existence of Ukraine, Israel, Palestine, or NATO. Indeed, each drains our resources, expands our commitments, betrays our strategic stupidity, deepens our debt, and needlessly increases – because of a long war-mad, suborned, and constitutionally irresponsible Congress — our chances of getting into a war for peoples and/or entities that are, at base, worthless to us and from whom we earn only scorn, threats, and less national security

The U.S. government’s responsibility rests on only five principles; namely, (a) the protection of America’s territorial integrity and people, the maintenance of all of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, (b) ensuring there is a vibrant republicanism nationally and in each state; (c) displaying an appropriate and genuine level of thankfulness for God’s gifts to Christian America, among which are the broad oceans that flank the republic, deep harbors, abundant natural resources, navigable rivers, endless fertile land, ample potable water, the best-kept environment in the world, and (d) the consistent use of the stern commonsense and measured pessimism that characterized the republic’s founding. The Lord’s gifts are things that only fools would dare to ignore or deliberately cock-up. Sadly, since 1917 our republic’s elites, as a whole, can best be described by the term “fools a’plenty”, bent only on causing wars and filling their pockets, while our children die in the unnecessary wars they are sent to fight but never to win. Thus, the failure to win any war since 1945.

Since 1783, this republic has never had an ally that it would not be better off without, nor a foreign nation whose disappearance or destruction would matter a lick. Americans need to examine the shocking and debilitating mess that both political parties deliberately have made of the republic, its wealth and economy, its once ethnically compatible and patriotic population, its social cohesion, its borders, its respect for religion, and its fierce detestation of foreign wars and the idiot idea of taking orders from foreigners and foreign institutions they had no voice in electing or creating. Having done that review, Americans worth the name will know what needs to be done. The republic’s existence now depends on whether they decide to do it.

The New World Order-obsessed Pope has sent FBI and its DOJ masters more Vatican-backed “evidence” for listing, harrassing,  prosecuting, and probably imprisoning American Catholics as “terrorists”. The Pope pictures American Catholic traditionalists as backward and dangerous, and implies they are trying to hold back what he sees as progress — which means the worldwide implementation of communism, replacement migration, and the continued inoculation with lethal vaccines, all goals of the Pope-supported New World Order.

A piece published in by the Associated Press on 18 October 2023 merits a read by all American Catholics and Christians. In it the Pope sounds less  like a cleric eager to protect his flock, and much more like the head of a Vatican-based press gang who is ready to chain his American opponents to the oars of a a 16th century Spanish galleon.

It also is worth noting that the Pope is directly attacking the American political system. When he says Americans have “replaced religion with ideology” he is expressing his hatred for Trump, his supporters, the Founders, individual liberty, and free speech, as well as  our most important state documents, the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, On the Necessity of Taking up Arms, etc. At the same time he is supporting a mass of lethal and authoritarian American miscreants like Biden, the Bushes, the Obamas, the Clintons, and the whole of the Democratic Party.

The Pope also forgets that it was the long fight put up by American Catholics and their allies in other Christian sects that finally brought an end to the  the U.S. federal government’s protection of murder-by-abortion, which yielded the deliberate killing of 63 million American infants, from which profit was derived by the murderers from selling the body parts of the slaughtered. Believers know that this was an achievement expected of them by the Lord, and those who were murdered by callous and well-paid doctors-killers should be honored each year by a presidential “Declaration of a Day of National Humiliation, Fasting, and Prayer.” The Pope of course should likewise issue such an annual proclamation at a success that pleased God, but he will not. It would offend his authoritarian partners, all of whom are striving to kill many more human beings of all faiths and colors with additional lethal vaccines, as well as to reduce those who are not killed to abject poverty and starvation.

The AP article follows. The Pope’s threat in it can be heard loud and clear. It demands the utmost opposition and denunciation from American Catholics, Christians, and all loyal to Christ and/or the First Amendment.

“During the meeting, a Portuguese Jesuit told Francis that he had suffered during a recent sabbatical year in the United States because he came across many Catholics, including some U.S. bishops, who criticized Francis’ 10-year papacy as well as today’s Jesuits.

The 86-year-old Argentine acknowledged his point, saying there was “a very strong, organized, reactionary attitude” in the U.S. church, which he called “backward.” He warned that such an attitude leads to a climate of closure, which was erroneous.

“Doing this, you lose the true tradition and you turn to ideologies to have support. In other words, ideologies replace faith,” he said.

“The vision of the doctrine of the church as a monolith is wrong,” he added. “When you go backward, you make something closed off, disconnected from the roots of the church,” which then has devastating effects on morality.

“I want to remind these people that backwardness is useless, and they must understand that there’s a correct evolution in the understanding of questions of faith and morals,” that allows for doctrine to progress and consolidate over time.”

During the meeting, a Portuguese Jesuit told Francis that he had suffered during a recent sabbatical year in the United States because he came across many Catholics, including some U.S. bishops, who criticized Francis’ 10-year papacy as well as today’s Jesuits.

The 86-year-old Argentine acknowledged his point, saying there was “a very strong, organized, reactionary attitude” in the U.S. church, which he called “backward.” He warned that such an attitude leads to a climate of closure, which was erroneous.

“Doing this, you lose the true tradition and you turn to ideologies to have support. In other words, ideologies replace faith,” he said.

“The vision of the doctrine of the church as a monolith is wrong,” he added. “When you go backward, you make something closed off, disconnected from the roots of the church,” which then has devastating effects on morality.

“I want to remind these people that backwardness is useless, and they must understand that there’s a correct evolution in the understanding of questions of faith and morals,” that allows for doctrine to progress and consolidate over time.

Francis has previously acknowledged the criticism directed at him from some U.S. conservatives, once quipping that it was an “honor” to be attacked by Americans.”

Endnote:

1.) “Pope says some ‘backward’ conservatives in US Catholic Church have replaced faith with ideology.” See, https://apnews.com/article/pope-francis-vatican-conservatives-abortion-us-bbfc346c117bd9ae68a1963478bea6b3